Tag Archives: Israel

Advocating for Peace = Torturing Victims? The Crazy Logic of David Friedman


Debbie says:

David Friedman, Trump’s selection for ambassador to Israel, is about who you’d expect. He’s Jewish, he’s rich, he’s done crony deals with the Donald, and he’s a hard-core Israel-can-do-no-wrong apologist. Those things make me roll my eyes and tremble for my country, as almost all of Trump’s proposed appointees do.

But one comment of his left me shaking with rage. In June, he compared Jewish Voice for Peace, a thoughtful organization which lobbies for the two-state solution, to “kapos,” the incarcerated Jews who acted as trusties for the Germans in the World War II death camps. In fact, he compared JVP unfavorably to kapos. (Follow the highly inflammatory link at your own risk.)

The kapos did face (and often engage in) extraordinary cruelty. I am forced to agree with Friedman that none of us know what we would have done under those circumstances.

However, no Jew should ever compare another Jew to a kapo. No Jew should ever accuse someone he disagrees with, someone who is taking peaceful actions to reach a goal he doesn’t want to see happen.

An advocate for peace, even if you think that peace is a bad idea, cannot be compared with a person who has the power to put his boot on your face and put his weight on the boot, let alone encourage the masters to send you to the gas chamber sooner rather than later.

That a man who can throw around such painful, emotional, terrifying images and be proud of them would (will?) be an ambassador, would (will?) walk into Israel with all of his hatreds firmly in place — well, it’s the Donald Trump way.

I hate this attitude with my whole soul, but most days I’m just in a background simmer. Today this story pushed me over the edge into fury. At least fury is fuel for resistance.

Words are Powerful

Laurie says:

Deb and I consider the essays and texts that accompany my photos to be vital to our work. We spend lots of time doing outreach, lectures, workshops etc., and working with the communities of people who are photographed in order to get the right texts. We listen a lot. We never have an exhibition without texts. So when I saw this story on Muzzlewatch, the Jewish Voice for Peace news blog, I was really struck by it.

“After only 2 days, in response to complaints (which have not been made public), Stanford University removed photographs on April 9 by Lisa Nessan, a young Jewish photographer and peace activist who has spent a great deal of time in Israel and the Palestinian Occupied Territories…”

And then a day later

“Actually, it was the captions and the title of the photo exhibit. The Stanford administration approved photos of Palestinians taken by photographer Lisa Nessan for an exhibit called “Hope Under Siege.” But when the sponsoring student group, Students Confronting Apartheid by Israel (SCAI), changed the title to “Life Under Israeli Apartheid” and others on campus complained, the administration pulled down the exhibit after just two days. Students say the captions all include information from human rights groups like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.

Nonetheless, Stanford offered to reinstate the entire show without the title or captions. Student organizers wisely said NO, and held a protest instead. The campus group Students Confronting Apartheid by Israel (SCAI) writes that it was “part of their “Women Under Fire” series that highlighted Jewish resistance to Israeli apartheid.”

Four of the photos without the original captions are on Flickr.

People always say that “a picture is worth a thousand words,” but sometimes words are powerful. All too often without context photographs that have strong social change aspects become depoliticized art that can be appreciated only aesthetically.

When we worked on publishing Women en Large, we turned down publication offers from two otherwise excellent feminist presses because they would only publish it if we pulled the text. We were told it was “too polemic”.

I’ve been told numerous times by people who saw Women En Large in galleries that without the text they wouldn’t have appreciated the social change meaning of the work. Words are powerful.

I really respect SCAI’s decision not to allow the exhibition with the captions censored.

Thanks to Jean Pauline from Bay Area Women in Black for sending me this.