Tag Archives: gay marriage

Thanksgiving 2012

Since 2005, we’ve been writing posts about news to be thankful for. This year, we have a lot to celebrate.

The bulk of our good news this year (but not all of it!) comes from the U.S. elections, but before we get to that, here’s breaking good news.

Israel and Hamas have agreed to a ceasefire, brokered by Egyptian president (and Muslim Brotherhood member) Mohammed Mursi, bolstered by Barack Obama’s and Hilary Clinton’s efforts to get Israel to give the plan a try. It’s brand-new, it may not last, and it isn’t a harbinger of solutions to this horrible conflict. But it does mean at least a break in the warfare, and Israeli troops standing down from marching into Palestine.

We know the next section is very American-centric. Obama is not a progressive and there’s a lot to worry about in his next four years. But still, here’s the inimitable Rachel Maddow’s list of things to be thankful for after the November elections (and we could add more).

“We are not going to have a Supreme Court that will overturn Roe v. Wade.”

There are not going to be any Antonin Scalias and Samuel Alitos added to this court.

We are not going to repeal health reform.

Nobody is going to kill Medicare and make old people in this generation or any other generation fight it out on the open market to get themselves health insurance. We are not going to do that.

We are not going to give a 20% tax cut to millionaires and billionaires and expect programs like food stamps and expect programs like food stamps and kids’ health insurance to cover the cost of that tax cut.

We’re not going to make you clear it with your boss if you want to get birth control under the insurance plan that you’re on.

We are not going to redefine rape. We are not going to amend the United States Constitution to stop gay people from getting married.

We are not going to double Guantanamo.

We are not eliminating the Department of Energy or the Department of Education or Housing at the federal level.

We are not going to spend $2 trillion on the military that the military does not want.

We are not scaling back on student loans because the country’s new plan is that you should borrow money from your parents.

We are not vetoing the DREAM Act. We are not self-deporting.

We are not letting Detroit go bankrupt.

We are not starting a trade war with China on Inauguration Day in January.

We are not going to have as a president a man who once led a mob of friends to run down a scared gay kid to hold him down and forcibly cut his hair off with a pair of scissors while that kid cried and screamed for help, and there was no apology, not ever.

We are not going to have a Secretary of State John Bolton.

We are not bringing Dick Cheney back. We are not going to have a foreign policy shop stocked with the architects of the Iraq War. We are not going to do it.

We had the choice to do that, if we wanted to do that as a country. And we said no, loudly.

Good news from around the world:

January 13, 2012 marked India’s first year with no new polio cases. In 2009, India had among the largest number of new polio cases in the world.

Later in the year, a new treatment started showing great promise in reducing malaria.

Young people in Africa are showing up as tech wizards. First, there were the Ethiopian kids who got proficient with their “One Laptop Per Child” laptops, which were dropped off with no instructions.

“I thought the kids would play with the boxes. Within four minutes, one kid not only opened the box, found the on-off switch … powered it up. Within five days, they were using 47 apps per child, per day. Within two weeks, they were singing ABC songs in the village, and within five months, they had hacked Android,”  [Nicholas] Negroponte [founder of One Laptop Per Child] said. “Some idiot in our organization or in the Media Lab had disabled the camera, and they figured out the camera, and had hacked Android.”

But that news was dwarfed by the Nigerian girls who invented a urine-powered generator, which can turn one liter of pee into six hours of electricity.

While African teens are fixing the world, other things are also getting better on that continent, specifically a sharp decrease in female genital mutilation.

Back in the United States, before the Republican rape apologists started opening their mouths and losing elections, the FBI redefined “forcible rape” to include all nonconsensual penetration, instead of the old definition which only applied to women and was far less stringent. This took far longer than it should have, but it does open up possibilities for a lot of horrible abuses to be appropriately charged and tried.

Eleven countries and parts of two others (Mexico and the U.S.) have legalized gay marriage. In the U.S., gay marriage is legal in nine states and the District of Columbia. Three of those U.S. states were just added to the list in November, and one more (Minnesota) voted down a Constitutional amendment that would have made gay marriage illegal in the state.

Since it’s always a good time to remember our foremothers and the folks whose thought, work, and activism have helped us get here, let’s include Anna’s American feminist literary canon. Who wants to help make a more global one?

On the more radical front in the U.S., thousands of Americans march in the streets on May Day, a holiday which America usually ignores. Union activity is ramping up for the end of the year. The folks from Occupy Wall Street have covered themselves with glory in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy: “We’ve been building neighborhood assemblies and community support networks,” [organizer Justin Wede] said. “So this relief is a natural response for us, where communities band together to reach out and support each other.”

Debbie has been involved with Occupy Oakland Foreclosure Defense Group’s DefendJodie action, which has currently helped keep Jodie Randolph in her home for more than two weeks after the moving truck and evicters were due to show up on Election Day.

And perhaps the most exciting Occupy-related news of all: Rolling Jubilee launched on November 15, just five days ago. Taking advantage of (and showcasing) the absurd ways in which banks will sell your debt for pennies on the dollar (just not to you!), Rolling Jubilee has already raised enough money to buy up and then forgive over $7.5 million in medical (and other) debt owed by Americans. The system is so rigged that they can do this with $375,000 in contributions. Debt forgiveness is random, and comes with a letter from Rolling Jubilee explaining that you no longer owe the money. The organizers of Rolling Jubilee and their related organization Strike Debt (“a coalition of Occupy groups looking to build popular resistance to all forms of debt imposed on us by the banks”) have positioned themselves to change the relationship of Americans to the powers that keep us in debt.

As we said at the beginning, much of the good news this year is U.S.-centric. But lots of that news has the potential to be felt around the world.

Gay Marriage and Size Acceptance: More Related than You Might Think

Debbie says:

It shouldn’t surprise any regular (or even occasional readers) that here at Body Impolitic we support gay marriage and we fought against California’s Proposition 8. We didn’t blog about it much, though, because we don’t generally write about electoral politics.

However, this article by Deacon Keith Fournier in Catholic Online draws a connection worth examining. Fournier, like many (but certainly not all) believing Catholics, starts from the position that gay marriage is against the will of God, quoting Pope Benedict XI from before his papacy: “To choose someone of the same sex for one’s sexual activity is to annul the rich symbolism and meaning, not to mention the goals, of the Creator’s sexual design.”

Therefore, Fournier argues, accusations like homophobia and intolerance are smokescreens. Those who support equal rights and safety for GLBT people (such as President Obama) are heading down a bad path. “Efforts of some within the homosexual movement to equate how one engages in non-marital sexual acts with a member of the same sex with being a member of a particular race, or gender and thereby a ‘protected class’ for civil rights purposes is legally and socially dangerous. One is a status; the other involves behavior, a chosen behavior and a lifestyle.”

From here, it probably isn’t hard to guess how size acceptance enters the picture. It’s so easy to imagine that last sentence as a differentiator between, say, having a disabling neuromuscular disease and being fat: one is “a status” and the other “involves a chosen behavior.”

Fournier, as you may have already gathered, isn’t a very original thinker, and he follows that line to the letter.

“A very good argument can be made that obesity also has a genetic predisposition. However, I will fight it my whole life because it is unhealthy. It is a disordered appetite. Should we as a Nation decide that fat people have a civil right to be fat? Should those who insist that they resist that “genetic predisposition” to overeat be called Fata-phobic?”

First of all, he clearly doesn’t know how to use Google. He thinks he’s being sarcastic. Many of the Google hits on “fataphobic” link to Fournier’s column (including this excellent response by A Sarah at Shapely Prose), but the first line is “did you mean ‘fatphobic’?” So it would have taken him thirty seconds to find out that he was not making up an out-of-bounds concept to make fun of.

It might have taken him 90 seconds to find out that obesity is not the same as “disordered eating.” In fact, the most common usages of that phrase are anorexia, bulimia, and milder indicator versions of those behaviors. Or he might have spent that 90 seconds learning that his flat conviction that obesity is unhealthy is not a universal belief.

Worst of all, he can’t think about his own statements. Tucked between his little diatribe about obesity and a return to his rant about gay marriage, he says, “Our bodies do not lie, they speak the language written within their constitution and confirmed in the Natural Law which binds us all. ”

Sarah at Shapely Prose picked up on that sentence and very usefully went in a different direction than I did:

Specifically, you seem very worried about that “special” right — which I’m sure you have never enjoyed yourself — NOT to have your identity judged legally and bindingly “disordered,” according to one particular religious account of “the language written within [its] constitution and confirmed in the Natural Law which binds us all.”

She is, of course, right. He thinks he knows what “Natural Law” is, and his job is to tell us.

I really wish that, instead of using that comment about bodies not lying to shore up his positions, he’d thought about what it means. It’s the one point in the article where I agree with him.

My body is my body, and when I react erotically to someone of my gender, that’s not a lie. My body is my body and when I find myself hungry after what the book or website tells me should be a full meal, that’s not a lie. My body is my body, and if I am healthy and on no blood pressure, cholesterol, or blood sugar medications at 260 (or so) pounds and 57 years, that’s not a lie. My body is my body, and when it shakes with fear or rage because its reactions, or size, or preferences make it unsafe, that’s not a lie.

Deacon Fournier has a little inkling of the truth buried in his knee-jerk beliefs. I hope he listens to his body.

Thanks to Joe Decker for the pointer.