Tag Archives: fatphobia

Resources for Fat People Looking for Total Joint Replacement Surgery

We support a ceasefire in Palestine.

stylized picture of an x-ray in dark blue, with one hip and both knees showing red for pain and inflammation

Debbie says:

A fat person who needs a total joint replacement of their hips and/or their knees can run into an almost impenetrable wall of rejection. Many if not most doctors who perform these surgeries believe the common wisdom that outcomes of these surgeries are affected by the patient’s body mass index (BMI) to the point where many of them simply turn patients away out of hand.

(TL;DR: if you are looking for medical evidence to share with potential surgeons on why they might be wrong, I’ve collected some here and it’s available for you to use. It’s also available for you to add to, so it can be more useful to the next person. Just leave comments with links, and I’ll incorporate the new information. All details and links to the studies listed below are available at the link. Pointers to surgeons who are open to working with fat people also very welcome.)

To begin with, BMI is arrant nonsense; all it is is the ratio of your weight to the square of your height. I wrote about it here in 2007 and nothing about its history (invented by a statistician with no medical training), its uselessness, or its general acceptance by the medical profession has changed in 17 years. I call it “braindead, meaningless, insidious.”

But here we are, being forced to deal with it as if it was real.

I’ve known about the problem with obtaining joint replacement surgery for a long time, but recently a close friend of mine has been going through it, and it made me really angry. It’s especially frustrating because she is very close to the same weight she was in 2017 when she had a successful replacement on the other knee, and now the surgeon who did that one, and several other surgeons, have turned her away without a word of compassion or empathy. “Lose weight and come back,” they say, often that bluntly.

So I decided to do some research. And sure, there’s a lot of research that says BMI increases risk of surgical complications, particularly infection immediately after surgery. But there’s also substantial evidence that this is not necessarily true–my personal guess is that many of the studies that show additional risk are flawed by an implicit bias against doing anything medical to help a fat person until/unless they lose weight.

Some examples from the research linked above:

In a study of 2,040 patients, published in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, July 19, 2017:

 A greater obesity level was associated with more pain at baseline but greater postoperative pain relief, so the average postoperative pain scores did not differ significantly according to BMI status. Patients undergoing TKR had an average age of 69 years; 61% were women, 93% were white, and 25% were severely or morbidly obese. A greater obesity level was associated with a lower PCS score at baseline and 6 months. The postoperative gain in PCS score did not differ by BMI level. A greater obesity level was associated with worse pain at baseline but greater pain relief at 6 months, so the average pain scores at 6 month were similar across the BMI levels.”

In a comprehensive literature review, plus interviews with leading surgeons, published in Arthroplast Today in October 2022:

Importantly, as obese patients have been demonstrated to have equal or greater gains in functional outcomes and quality of life metrics, it is important for obese patients to have access to TJA.

This paper is especially interesting, as it breaks down the factors a surgeon can/should consider in making this decision, taking the conversation away from the rigidity of BMI into a serious examination of risks.

Because so much of the conventional wisdom is some 2020s version of “just lose weight and come back,” I tried to put my finger on truly good studies about the difficulty of losing weight; however, the amount of noise about this, even in serious medical papers, made it almost impossible to evaluate. So the document above closes with information from a careful examination of factors that keep people from losing weight, published in the Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition, March 2, 2024. The authors identify five major categories of complicating factors preventing weight loss (biological, medical, interventional, lifestyle, and environmental), each with 3-6 subcategories. So it might encourage a doctor to think in a more nuanced way.

Oh, and my friend? She found a fairly reasonable surgeon (or at least his physician’s assistant seems reasonable) who treated her like a human being and paid attention to who she actually is. They still want her to lose weight before scheduling the surgery, but it seems like they have some flexibility in their approach and she feels reasonably comfortable working with them. And she’s waiting a few months — in pain — to see if she can meet their criteria.

Me, I think the whole thing is bullshit and anyone who is in severe pain and physical limitation from needing joint replacement should have the risks explained, and get to make a choice. And the surgeons should be interested in long-term outcomes rather than immediate risks. Oh, and we should have a decent humane health-care system in the United States while we’re at it.

Please use the resource linked above if it can help you. Share it widely so we can make it better. And let me know how useful it is or isn’t.

======================

I occasionally post on Mastodon.

Follow Laurie’s Pandemic Shadows photos on Instagram.

======================

Weight Loss for Its Own Sake: At What Cost

We support a ceasefire in Palestine

Several Ozempic pressure applicators, arranged loosely on a background of Rx labeled wallpaper

Laurie and Debbie say:

Ozempic: it’s a diabetes drug which also works for weight loss; it’s a wonder drug that will solve the obesity epidemic; it’s a rich people’s drug that will ensure that only poor people are fat; it’s a scam; it’s all things to all people.

We’ve been very skeptically watching Ozempic’s trajectory through the news since it started being regularly available (to some people) about two years ago. Weight loss wonder drugs tend to appear, fail, and vanish. Ozempic (also called Wegovy when it’s prescribed for weight loss) is lasting longer than most. So, the problems it causes are getting very obvious.

As we know so well, the vast majority of doctors believe that fat is, in itself, a disease and health risk which must be eliminated at all costs–and now the doctors have a drug that will actually “work” to meet the doctors’ goals–whether or not those are the patients’ goals. Angelina Chapin, writing for The Cut, has a heartbreaking set of stories of patients (generally women) pushed by their doctors into taking the drug. Chapin cites five examples–different stories, same underlying medical myth:

Marcy was diagnosed with lymphedema, a condition that causes fluid to build up in her legs, in 2021. The 53-year-old from Queens wanted to work with a nutritionist to follow an anti-inflammatory diet that she hoped would lessen the pain and swelling. Her primary-care doctor made a referral last year, but the callback came from an office administrator at a hospital weight-management center. The person told her that she’d need to be evaluated and then choose between having weight-loss surgery or going on Ozempic. Marcy, who describes herself as “visibly plus size,” told them there must be a misunderstanding. Her goal was to develop better eating habits, not to lose weight. But the administrator said that in order to work with a nutritionist, Marcy had to join the weight-loss program, which a nurse reiterated in a follow-up call.

It felt to Marcy like these health professionals had seen her BMI and made the assumption that “All fat people are unhealthy.” Though her medical chart says she’s obese, Marcy doesn’t have diabetes, high cholesterol, or high blood pressure. The swelling from lymphedema has made her gain weight, but she doesn’t eat regularly because the pain “kind of curbs my appetite.” And yet, medical workers are “focusing on the number on the scale,” she says. “You’re ignoring my diagnosis. How am I supposed to get better?”

Another example in Chapin’s article has high cortisol levels which the doctor told her “don’t matter.” More than one have eating disorder histories and are afraid of the psychological consequences of limiting their food intake.

This is bad enough. If Chapin found five examples, there are probably 5,000 people out there dealing with this right now. Or, there were about that many until last month, when Medicare approved the drug. Dylan Scott, writing for Future Perfect at Vox, has a powerful analysis of what Medicare approval means. Please note that Scott has a wide-eyed naive acceptance of the “obesity epidemic,” and thus of the medical value of Ozempic. Despite this shameful assumption, he comes away with major reservations about widespread prescription of Ozempic:

there is growing data that these drugs also reduce heart disease risk — one clinical trial involving more than 17,000 patients found Wegovy significantly reduced the chances of an adverse cardiovascular event such as heart attack or stroke. Just 6.5 percent of participants who received Wegovy experienced an acute cardiac emergency, compared to 8 percent of patients who took a placebo. …

The medications are extraordinarily powerful at controlling patients’ appetite and therefore aiding weight loss; in clinical trials, patients lost an average of 15 percent of their body weight in little over a year.

But that’s only as long as patients continue to take them — once a patient stops the drug, the benefits go away. And medication adherence is a struggle across the US health system.

And even if people do adhere to regular doses, taking Wegovy or Ozempic long-term may prove prohibitively expensive. Even Medicare enrollees can pay up to $2,000 out of pocket annually for their prescription drugs, depending on their specific plan.

The available evidence suggests patients will gain back some or all of the weight they had lost if they stop taking semaglutide. The whiplash of losing and then regaining weight may even be worse for a person’s health than if they had never lost the weight in the first place, Stacie Dusetzina, a health policy professor at Vanderbilt University, told me. Doctors call it “weight cycling.”

No reader of Body Impolitic is likely to be unfamiliar with the medical dangers of “weight cycling,” or “yo-yo dieting,” or whatever you want to call it. Scott apparently never heard of it. But look!

Given the evidence that people struggle to maintain weight loss over time, some experts have called for putting less emphasis on losing weight for people who are obese or overweight and more on improving their access to medical care.

Holding Chapin’s article next to Scott’s, we immediately see that Medicare’s coverage of this drug will result in tens of thousands of people being pushed by their doctors into taking it. Some of them will be aware enough to understand that their weight is not their problem, and at least try to push back. Others–the vast majority–will buy into the combination of the social conviction that fat is always and forever bad for you, and the pressure from their medical care team, and will not even have the tools to examine the recommendation.

At the end of her article, Chapin returns to Marcy:

Marcy, the woman with lymphedema, tells me she recently found a nutritionist who has agreed to discuss an anti-inflammation diet without pushing weight loss. She’s excited to finally work with a health professional who won’t jump to conclusions based on her size. “I’m not on a couch, eating a half-gallon of ice cream,” Marcy says. She now hopes to become more active with the help of a pump to massage the fluid in her leg and compression leggings. “I want to do Alaska next year,” she says, “and I want to be on a dog sled.” It’s something most doctors she’s been treated by didn’t see in her future.

The United States (and much of the world) is culturally incapable of separating fat from health, acknowledging that in some situations fat contributes to health issues and in other situations it does not. This country is medically incapable of expecting doctors to listen to patients’ concerns (such as wanting to be on a dog sled) and address them rather than jump to a sometimes completely inaccurate conclusion. It is also politically incapable of reining in Big Pharma and requiring affordable drugs and drug plans (although the Biden administration is addressing that issue with moderate success). Until all of these things change, Ozempic should be administered cautiously, to people who both need it and are not threatened by its side effects, and in ways that break no one’s pocketbook.

Fat chance.

======================

Debbie has deleted her Twitter account. Follow her on Mastodon.

Follow Laurie’s Pandemic Shadows photos on Instagram.

======================