Monthly Archives: March 2009

Unexpected Art

Laurie says:

I’ve been wanting to have beautiful 8.5 by 11″ prints of my work that really satisfied me for quite a while. On Epson 2200 printer I was able to make made beautiful 13 by 19″ archival digital prints that I was very happy with. Only a few of my images were completely satisfying in 8.5 by 11″. Serendipitously (although that was not my initial reaction) my 2200 printer expired, forcing me to get the new 2880 printer.

I can make prints on the new printer in the 8.5 by 11″ size that I’m absolutely delighted with. For the last few months, I’ve been working with my friend Ctein, who is a truly remarkable digital printer, on reinterpreting and remaking my work on the new Epson printer. So far I’ve done groups of prints from Women of Japan and Women En Large:Images of Fat Nudes. I’ll be working on the images fromFamiliar Men:A Book of Nudes prints soon. I’ve had two motives for this. One had been the art and the other is making accessible work. These prints are $50. My darkroom prints in this size are $500.

nude of Edna sitting on rocks

Some unexpected things have happened on the way. I’m working in Photoshop on the prints, but I checked one of them in Preview and made an interesting discovery.

nude of Edna sitting on rocks line drawing

The human (artist’s) eye goes from the sketch to the photograph. Preview, which has been ‘told’ by its programmers what is important to the human eye, goes from the photograph to the sketch. The result is a line drawing that abstracts my composition in some of the photographs in a way that creates a different art. This is quite selective. It only works aesthetically in some of the images, but when it does I have new and unexpected art.

It’s also giving me some new insights in the way I compose my images. In this image of Chupoo in the doorway, the line drawing has a different sensibility but one I think still expresses her.

chupoo in a doorway

chupoo in a doorway line drawing

Old Navy: Blatant Racism and Deniability in One Commercial

Laurie and Debbie say:

Old Navy has launched a series of commercials and advertising featuring department-store mannequins (which they call “supermodelquins”) as the main characters. In keeping with the standards of our times, most of the supermodelquins are white, and a few appear to be African-American. In an astonishingly offensive move, one of the commercials features a black woman whose clothes are suddenly and unexpectedly ripped off, and replaced by black “modesty bars.”

Watch at your own risk.

Harry Allen wrote about this in Media Assassin, and he said so much of what needs to be said, especially well. Read his whole piece, especially the introduction about James Baldwin, Obama, and the myth of post-racial America. Here are some of his pithy comments on the commercial itself:

I wasn’t waiting around to, figuratively, see a Black female’s clothes ripped away in front of her husband and children, above, as her mate futilely tries to rescue some of her dignity and shield her nude body from the gaze of the only white man there, right. (”Sweets!” he exclaims.)

Of course, except for the fluorescent store lights and cheap, made-in-Mexico clothing, the preceding paragraph sounds like any number of racial confrontations with white men that Black males inevitably lost. In a nation where the Black female was widely portrayed as hot, lustful, and aggressive, and her body endlessly and transgressively sexualized, the Black mannequin’s sassy, smiling retort to her own violation—”Oh, what: Like you never seen plastic before!”—affirms, symbolically, that, you know: They like it.

Many Black people will be frustrated by the responses that white people often have, both to articles like this one, and to perceptions of racism in, what to white people, are these silly, little, seemingly insignificant corners of life. (”You people see racism/em> everywhere!”, Caucasians quickly claim.) But Black people should expect this, because without some sort of strong disruption, many white people will not see racism.

He goes on to explain quite clearly why this is true, including the memorable comment:

I think many Black people believe that white people who practice racism will stop doing so if they get to know more Black people, learn more Black history, and have a few home-cooked meals with us. I don’t really agree, but I do believe, as a mentor whose ideas I respect has often said, “Anything people do, people can stop doing.”

One of the insidiously nasty aspects of the claim that Obama’s election makes America post-racial is that it reinforces the already-strong false justification, “Oh, it wasn’t about race!” or “Oh, we just made that mannequin black by accident. It could have been any of the other commercials!” Sure, it could. We haven’t seen all the other commercials, but we bet that none of them would evoke the near-naked woman for sale on the slave block the way this one does. And the horrifying thing is that the people who wrote, and approved, and filmed the commercial probably don’t even realize how racism is coloring their choices. It just “looked all right” to them. “See, we’re including Black people! We’re not racists!”

(They’re probably going to say the same thing about the [white] mannequin legs sticking up out of the trash. “We’re not sexists! That’s just what happens to old mannequins. We’re just telling the truth.”)

We believe, with Harry Allen and his mentor, that anything people do, people can stop doing. We also believe that what people do, people won’t stop doing without pressure. Old Navy is a division of the Gap, and can be reached at

Two Folsom Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
(650) 952-4400

Debbie found this on the Facebook group Whites Overcoming Racism through Knowledge.